Systematic and scoping reviews typically have several standard screening stages:
Blinded Screening
Ideally, both the title/abstract and full text screening stages should utilize a blinded screening model. This means that two reviewers will vote on every article and they will not know how the other person voted. This helps prevent influence or bias from being introduced into the project.
In the event that the two reviewers disagree, a third reviewer should be asked to resolve the conflict by also casting a vote about the item in question. This process should also be blinded, meaning that the tie-breaker should not know how either of the initial reviewers voted.
To help facilitate the screening process, many reviewers will use a tool such as Covidence to perform their screening.
To sign up for an account under the Ohio State institutional subscription, following the instructions on the following webpage.
They also have an excellent knowledge bank that provides instructions and videos on how to perform almost any task within the system.
Video created by Covidence.
When you are ready to perform your full text screening, you will need to first go out and collect the full text articles for each study that has made it to this stage.
Covidence has a PDF bulk import tool that can allow you to bring in multiple full text articles at once. You must work in tandem with either the EndNote or Zotero citation managers to use this tool. A link to instructions is below.
If you are unable to locate the full text of a particular item through the OSU Library subscriptions, you can request a copy through Interlibrary Loan (ILL).